Categories
Formal Essays

Formal Essay 2 – Final

What is your first instinct upon seeing a blank space? To fill it in. From a young age, we learned to “fill in the blanks”, from coloring books to quizzes. We began to associate blanks with a negative connotation, without even considering whether they were truly absent of material in the first place. Blanks mean incompleteness, and incompleteness means failure. In the same vein, filled spaces — particularly those that were previously blank — are perceived as triumphs and achievements. As we grow up, the blanks transition to new Google Docs and vacant sketchbook pages, empty minds and absent zeros. And in our world of “more is better” and “time is money”, there is no opportunity to stop and appreciate the beauty of blanks. Blanks are part of our everyday lives, shaping the way we perceive the world, think, and act. In Maps of the Imagination: The Writer as Cartographer, Peter Turchi explores the role of blank spaces in mapmaking and writing. His ideas can be applied to the map, United States and Territories, from Trexler Library’s Ray R. Brennen Map Collection. Analysis of the spaces on this map, blank, crowded, and absent, reveals that it is a representation of man’s desire to fill in blank spaces on paper and conquer land on earth. 

United States and Territories is a sprawling portrayal of nineteenth century America, a product of Manifest Destiny. The map, from the “New Topographical Atlas of the State of Pennsylvania; with Descriptions Historical, Scientific and Statistical”, was created by Henry Francis Walling in 1872. In order to understand the context and progress highlighted in the map, a trip back in time is in store. The earliest explorers chanced upon the eastern coast of the New World, hence most European colonization occurred there. From the boggy wetlands of Jamestown to the rickety cobblestone streets of Philadelphia, colonists established the first substantial land claims and hubs. This heavy initial settlement is clearly evidenced by the abundance of solid lanes, dashed lines, and dots (representing roads, railroads, and cities), as well as lack of blank space, in the eastern part of the continent. A westward roam of the eye reveals a travel through time and space. As great urban centers became overcrowded, cropland scarce, and immigrants overflowing, colonists sought to spread westward for more land. Throughout the 1800’s, America became fixated upon the idea of stretching from “sea to shining sea”. Coined Manifest Destiny, the concept reflected Americans’ beliefs in their God-given right to expand to the Pacific and claim the entire continent as America. The Oregon Trail, a treacherous route from Missouri to Oregon, provided a means of migration westward. As might be expected, but little acknowledged, conflicts occurred with Native Americans as white settlers encroached upon and stole their land. By the second half of the century, the advancement made in the name of Manifest Destiny was documented in United States and Territories. The left side of the map was partially filled in with lines, dots, and labels. Above Texas resided an area called Indian Territory, where Native American tribes were forced to relocate to as the end destination of the Trail of Tears. The particularly striking part of the map is the stark contrast between the density of symbols in the eastern and western portions of the country.

This contrast emphasizes the significance of space in United States and Territories and the nation it depicts, for they are the results of the instinctual human desire to fill blank spaces. To best understand how a map was made, one must first explore why. Considering history, the west and midwest would originally have been portrayed as a blank canvas. In the words of Turchi, “to be confronted with nothing in a carefully prepared context makes us newly aware of our assumptions and expectations” (51). What, then, were the assumptions and expectations of Americans given a carefully prepared empty map? The assumption that the land was unoccupied to begin with, and the expectation that providence was on their side. Such thinking screams of arrogance and privilege, and yet it was these very values that drove Manifest Destiny, an idea poised as nationalism masquerading as thinly veiled superiority. Settlers allowed themselves to craft a narrative and mindset in which they were intrepid and heroic, pioneers that set out to make their own fortunes and build their own place in the New World. In fact, Manifest Destiny was little more than an excuse used to justify man’s natural reaction to blank spaces: an irresistible beckoning to our basest desire to claim and our unquenchable thirst for more. 

 But all this begs the question: are blank spaces even truly blank, or do we choose to see them that way? Turchi states that “we can inspect the white for evidence of blemish or texture or we might imagine defacing it, or filling it in, and in that act of imagining see it as tabula rasa, the blank slate of opportunity” (50). Essentially, we ponder what already exists, or we subject it to our own desires. Either way, this interpretation implies that there is actually no such thing as blank spaces, only how we as humans choose to manipulate the existing. Manipulation suggests a lack of respect and appreciation for the original and natural, and an inclination towards the hunger for power as a creator and maker. After all, a blank slate means a chance to start over, and opportunity equals a chance for success. The temptation is too great for the vices of man, and so we almost always choose to see blank spaces as tabula rasa, as exemplified by two main ways in United States and Territories. Firstly, instead of following the natural features of the landscape, boxy borders were artificially established for western states in order to, frankly, make our lives easier. It is interesting to note that borders are not naturally meaningful phenomena, but only exist as a result of the will of humans. Secondly, Native Americans were the true first settlers of America, yet European settlers disregarded their presence and demeaned their claim to the land. The fact that belief in Manifest Destiny and in North America as a blank slate existed when Native Americans and their ancestors had lived on the land for millenia attests to humans’ greed.

United States and Territories is an excellent study of blank spaces and what they reveal about the nature of mankind. Supported by the ideas of Peter Turchi in Maps of the Imagination: The Writer as Cartographer, we can see the entitlement of man in the Manifest Destiny that led to the production of this map. The European settlers of then chose to see a blank slate of opportunity where there existed entire tribes, so the maps of today show an America with little to no Native American populations, and a western coast just as populated as the eastern coast. These filled spaces were built on the backs of thievery and conflict. A simple history lesson teaches us that “blank” spaces are best left blank, but as we know, human nature is difficult to change.

Works Referenced

Turchi, Peter. Maps of the Imagination: the Writer As Cartographer. Trinity University Press, 2007. Walling, Henry Francis. United States and Territories. Map. Edition. Philadelphia: Stedman, Brown & Lyon, 1872.

Categories
Formal Essays

Formal Essay 2 – Draft

What is your first instinct upon seeing a blank space? To fill it in. From a young age, we learned to “fill in the blanks”, from coloring books to quizzes. We began to associate blanks with a negative connotation, without even considering whether they were truly absent of material in the first place. Blanks mean incompleteness, and incompleteness means failure. In the same vein, filled spaces — particularly those that were previously blank — are perceived as triumphs and achievements. As we grow up, the blanks transition to new Google Docs and vacant sketchbook pages, empty minds and absent zeros. And in our world of more is better and time is money, there is no opportunity to stop and appreciate the beauty of blanks. Blanks are part of our everyday lives, shaping the way we perceive the world, think, and act. In Maps of the Imagination: The Writer as Cartographer, Peter Turchi explores the role of blank spaces in mapmaking and writing. His ideas can be applied to the map, United States and Territories, from Trexler Library’s Ray R. Brennen Map Collection. Analysis of the spaces on this map, blank, crowded, and absent, reveals that it is a representation of man’s desire to fill in blank spaces on paper and conquer land on earth. 

United States and Territories is a sprawling portrayal of nineteenth century America, a product of Manifest Destiny. The map, from the “New Topographical Atlas of the State of Pennsylvania; with Descriptions Historical, Scientific and Statistical”, was created by Henry Francis Walling in 1872. In order to understand the context and progress highlighted in the map, a trip back in time is in store. The earliest explorers chanced upon the eastern coast of the New World, hence most European colonization occurred there. From the boggy wetlands of Jamestown to the rickety cobblestone streets of Philadelphia, colonists established the first substantial land claims and hubs. This heavy initial settlement is clearly evidenced by the abundance of dotted lines and dots (representing railroads and cities), as well as lack of blank space, in the eastern part of the continent. A westward roam of the eye reveals a travel through time and space. As great urban centers became overcrowded, cropland scarce, and immigrants overflowing, colonists sought to spread westward for moore land. Throughout the 1800’s, America became fixated upon the idea of stretching from “sea to shining sea”. Coined Manifest Destiny, the concept reflected Americans’ beliefs in their God-given right to expand to the Pacific and claim the entire continent as America. The Oregon Trail, a treacherous route from Missouri to Oregon, provided a means of migration westward. As might be expected, but little acknowledged, conflicts occurred with Native Americans as white settlers encroached upon and stole their land. By the second half of the century, the advancement made in the name of Manifest Destiny was documented in United States and Territories. The left side of the map was partially filled in with lines, dots, and labels. Above Texas resided an area called Indian Territory, where Native American tribes were forced to relocate to as the end destination of the Trail of Tears. The particularly striking part of the map is the stark contrast between the density of symbols in the eastern and western portions of the country.

This contrast emphasizes the significance of space in United States and Territories and the nation it depicts, for they are the results of the instinctual human desire to fill blank spaces. To best understand how a map was made, one must first explore why. Considering history, the west and midwest would originally have been portrayed as a blank canvas. In the words of Turchi, “to be confronted with nothing in a carefully prepared context makes us newly aware of our assumptions and expectations” (51). What, then, were the assumptions and expectations of Americans given a carefully prepared empty map? The assumption that the land was unoccupied to begin with, and the expectation that providence was on their side. Such thinking screams of arrogance and privilege, and yet it was these very values that drove Manifest Destiny, an idea poised as nationalism masquerading as thinly veiled superiority. Settlers allowed themselves to craft a narrative and mindset in which they were intrepid and heroic, pioneers that set out to make their own fortunes and build their own place in the New World. In fact, Manifest Destiny was little more than an excuse used to justify man’s natural reaction to blank spaces: an irresistible beckoning to our basest desire to claim and our unquenchable thirst for more. 

United States and Territories is an excellent study of blank spaces and what they reveal about the nature of mankind. Supported by the ideas of Peter Turchi in Maps of the Imagination: The Writer as Cartographer, we can see the entitlement of man in the Manifest Destiny that led to the production of this map. A simple history lesson teaches us that “blank” spaces are best left blank, but as we know, human nature is difficult to change.

Categories
Reflections

Reading Ourselves: Writing Portfolio Review

Who would have thought that maps could teach me so much about thinking, writing, and the world at large? Coming into The Power of Maps, I was expecting an intensive course on maps — the scales, the drawings, the printing. In fact, I wondered where and how exactly the writing portion would play in, for how much could really be said about a map? Didn’t the map itself do all the talking, hold all the answers? Oh, how wrong I was! And therein lies the fundamental lesson I have learned from this FYS: to not to take things at face value. This course taught me to question, to examine, to analyze, as well as to understand, to empathize, to listen. Writing was the medium through which this learning occurred, and my writing has evolved in different ways as a result.

First and foremost, rereading my own writing has helped me realize what is good about it. With elegant language, my writing sounds beautiful and reads well. I was pleasantly surprised to discover how enjoyable it was to read my writing, both in my head and out loud. Two pieces of writing that particularly stood out to me were both Weekly Writings. “Week 1: Observe and Describe: The Rose Garden” allowed me to use vivid imagery to translate words into images, while “Week 7: Getting Creative About Maps” allowed me to express everything I had read about in a creative way. Another strength I noticed, especially while going through my reflections, was how I smoothly incorporate my thoughts and feelings about the text into analysis. A good example of this was “Counter-Counter-Mapping?”, my reflection on “Rethinking the Power of Maps” by Denis Wood. Specifically in the first paragraph, I expressed my reaction to the text in terms of how interesting and thought-provoking it was, transitioned into my opinion that Palestine was an effective example of the power of maps, then defended this opinion with analysis of the text.

Over the course of the semester, my writing has become more concise and precise. I can see this through my improvement in word choice, my selectivity of language with the greatest relevance and significance. I used to require more words to get across the same message, but now I feel that I pack a powerful punch in fewer, more specific words. The piece in particular that made me feel this was “Manscapes” and More, my reflection on Rebecca Solnit’s “City of Women”. It was short and anything but sweet. Instead, the two brief paragraphs stated arguments and analyses with strength.

While progress has been made, growth is a never-ending process. I would like to improve on my use of quotes by seamlessly embedding quotes and using them as a platform to expand my own writing, instead of letting them speak for me. In my latest reflection, “Cartographic Ethics”, I realized that I used two medium-length, full quotes in a single paragraph. To limit my quoting, I plan to list out the ones I want to use, only keep the parts the author spoke exceptionally well, and thoroughly analyze them in my own words. I might like to rewrite my first formal essay utilizing this method, as I felt that my quotes were relatively long. Another area for improvement is focusing more on a specific element in shorter reflections, instead of covering the entire reading. I can do this by practicing the 1 on 10 and 10 on 1 exercise that Dr. Albert taught us this semester. 

Overall, The Power of Maps and this review has made me more knowledgeable of my writing. I was able to reflect on where I need to improve, in addition to what I do well. I feel more confident and prepared for college level writing, which I am excited to continue improving in future writing intensives and as a writing tutor.

Categories
Reflections

Cartographic Ethics

In chapter 7 of The New Nature of Maps, “Can There Be Cartographic Ethics?”, J. B. Harley sets forth his argument on one of our class’s recent key discussions: subjectivity, availability, and standardization of maps. Per our class discussion, we realized the question of whether or not maps can be objective is a disputed topic. The “objective” side argued that maps of the physical landscape, like a network of roads, is not subjective. The choice of what to include or omit is, in itself, not the result of bias but practicality. In contrast, the “subjective” side contended that it is impossible to present an objective map because cartography is inherently subjective, based upon its practice as a representation of an individual’s perspective, with choices intentional or not that shapes the world in different ways. 

Even cartographers themselves say that “we are told about the ‘paradox’ in which ‘an accurate map’, to ‘present a useful and truthful picture’, must ‘tell white lies’” (200). This statement offers a look at the fundamental problems with the field of cartography when it comes to ethics. Cartographers are essentially admitting that creating any map requires small falsehoods, yet are quick to become defensive when criticized for this. In Harley’s words, “cartography will be unable to engage in an ethical debate while it continues to appeal only to its own internal standards yet is morally blind to issues in the world outside” (200). Here’s where Harley’s central argument comes to light: cartographical ethics can’t only be limited to techniques and practices, for maps have profound social impacts on the world at large. As such, mapmakers must take into account, and be held accountable for, such values in the worldviews they release to the public.  

Categories
Reflections

“Manscapes” and More

After learning about maps in a mostly political and abstract context, it was so refreshing to explore maps in a social context, especially a feminist one. It wasn’t until reading Rebecca Solnit’s “City of Women” that I realized, with a punch to the gut, that essentially every location I’ve seen on a map or been to in person has been named after a man — and I didn’t even question this. A term that Solnit used particularly stuck with me: “manscape”. This seems to be a more apt term to describe the societies that have been constructed, dominated, and perpetuated by men. Not only are men celebrated in life, but honored after death. Perhaps maps can be seen as the ultimate manifestation of the patriarchy — men, and their legacies, are memorialized in concrete and on paper, while the mere names of women are lost to the winds of time. 

Names may seem trivial, but they carry unimaginable power. They compose and define the world around us. As Solnit discussed, how would my confidence, my perceptions, my hopes and dreams be different if I was surrounded by the commemorations of distinguished women? I feel that I would have grown up in a different world. 

Categories
Reflections

Americans’ Thoughts on Government & Democracy

The Pew Research Center’s 2018 study, “The Public, the Political System and American Democracy” surveys Americans across the political spectrum on their views of government and citizenship. The general trend is an agreement with the importance of democratic values, but a disappointment with America’s performance in living up to them. Out of the 23 items assessing democracy in America, all were found important, yet only 8 were found to describe America very well. This means that the people, regardless of partisan support, are dissatisfied with the government, leaving much to be desired and improved.

From a different angle, participants in the study were also surveyed on their ideals for good citizenship. Democrats and Republicans mostly agree on the obligations of good citizenship. The difference lies in the exact percentages. In addition, Democrats value protest more (progress), while Republicans value the Pledge of Allegiance and displaying the flag more (nationalism). It is also interesting to note that leaners were less likely to rank aspects of citizenship as very important compared to partisans. This could be due to the fact that a lack of belonging to a certain group has not polarized their views. Last but not least, young people are less likely to place great importance on any aspect of citizenship. This is perhaps some truth to the saying that young people are not as politically involved today, but hopefully that has changed for the 2020 election. 

Categories
Formal Essays

Final Wrap on Formal Paper 1

For the final wrap on Formal Paper 1, I met up with Owen to review my essay and Dr. Albert’s comments. Based on the comments and suggestions, we were able to restructure my entire essay to defend my claim more effectively.

First and foremost, I was gratified to have my thesis called “fantastic”. I revisited the thesis multiple times, so it’s good to know that these rewrites were worth it. After all, the thesis is one of the most important parts of a paper, which sets up the foundation for the rest.

The body is where “more depth” could have been seen. Upon taking a step back and looking at my essay from a wider perspective, I saw that my first two body paragraphs had good content, but they were all abstract ideas. In fact, I was supporting Harley’s overall claim (from the prompt) with some of his smaller claims, instead of providing concrete evidence. Not until the last body paragraph did I truly start “making [my] own case” with the Evans map. Here’s the solution that Owen helped me come up with: instead of having the first two abstract paragraphs stand alone, I could write my next draft with the Evans map as the underlying framework of the paper. That is, I could analyze how all my ideas apply to the Evans map: the control of knowledge by the elite (governors in America, the monarchy in Britain), the political exploitation of maps (meddling by both sides for personal gain before publication), and the legitimization of land boundaries (colonial boundaries for America, expanded colonial territories/claims for Britain). Essentially, I would be taking my last body paragraph, which had the most developed ideas, and apply it to the entire piece.

Finally, we also worked on shortening my quotations, which I realized they were still quite long after cutting down on them before. It is so true that “[the] reader wanted to hear your words; not Harley’s!” Sometimes, I noticed that I actually provided analysis that discussed almost the same exact thing that I quoted from Harley, so it was easy to cut those parts out.

Overall, I feel that a next draft of Formal Essay 1 could be improved and polished with the Dr. Albert’s comments and Owen’s suggestions. 

Categories
Reflections

Halloween Special

https://www.thisamericanlife.org/sites/default/files/Everything_Sings_Excerpt_and_Intro.pdf

At first glance, Denis Wood’s maps of Boylan Heights appear random and factual. His initial purpose was to map everything in the area, which, of course, isn’t entirely possible. What he did achieve, however, was producing several objective-leaning maps that, taken altogether, can lead to subjective interpretations and conclusions. Particularly the maps of “SHOTGUN, BUNGALOW, MANSION”, “JACK-O’-LANTERNS”, and “NEWSLETTER PROMINENCE” point to representations of class. The first map outlines the societal — and physical — hierarchy that exists in Boylan Heights based on houses. At the top of the hill is a grand mansion, followed by solid, stately houses and houses with less heft further down the hill, tapering off to rows of shotgun houses at the base. Those with a greater economic status likely correspond with greater newsletter prominence — or community representation — Jack-o’-lantern placement — or community participation. Once inferences and perspectives are applied to a series of objective images, they can transform into ideas.

Categories
Reflections

Redlining, Segregation, & Maps

In the previous section of reading in Laura Vaughan’s, Mapping Society: The Spatial Dimensions of Social Cartography, she mostly explored maps where segregation was a choice, and not a result of helplessness. In the section for today, we dive into cases where spatial segregation is enforced, and judged on the basis of race and socioeconomic status. This can perhaps best be represented by redlining, a topic we visited a few weeks earlier. In 1933, in order to regulate the risks for mortgage loans the Federal Home Owners’ Loan Incorporation ranked neighborhoods from A through D, color-coded green, blue, yellow, red, meaning ‘Best, Still Desirable, Definitely Redlining, and Hazardous’. Most black neighborhoods were color coded red, which essentially doomed them if they weren’t already. These maps became “self-fulfilling prophecies” (156), making neighborhoods into the poverty areas (low resource, low opportunity, etc) that they had been judged as. As such, redlining was both a reflection and perpetuation of racism/prejudice, manifested in spatial form. An abstract attitude became tangible, a practice that would further exacerbate the abstract in physical forms such as economic, racial, and social marginalization.

Categories
Reflections

Mapping & Segregation

Today’s reading explored chapter 5, “Nationalities, Race, and Religion”, of Laura Vaughan’s book Mapping Society: The Spatial Dimensions of Social Cartography. She introduced the topic of segregation through the lens of urban areas, where segregation of people from different backgrounds is especially pronounced and prevalent. I thought exploring the divisions and integrations in cities was a very effective gateway to talking about the “disciplinary divide between the social and the spatial sciences” (130). We tend to think of — and get taught about — segregation in its spatial manifestations. That is, the physical separation of different peoples, from sections of cities to entire isolated communities. But there’s more to it than tangible divides: there are also social, abstract ones, such as class, wealth, background. In and of itself, segregation doesn’t have to be an inherently “bad” thing. In Vaughan’s words, “There is little evidence for determining exactly at what point separation by social group becomes problematic. Nor is it clear how one would arrive at the platonic ideal of social mixing” (131). However, when segregation becomes forced or exploited is when it becomes negative. The example that Vaughan provides is the targeted mapping residences owned by Chinese people control them.

css.php